Bioethics and livable lives for the future
A political articulation between Hans Jonas' Ethics of Responsibility and Judith Butler's idea of support
Keywords:
Planetary vulnerability, Ethics of Responsibility, Livable life, Support, InterdependenceAbstract
This paper is born out of the interpellation originated in the vulnerability of the planet – in its diversity and forms of life – due to human action. A possible answer – within the framework of the debates that open up from bioethics – can be elaborated from a dialogue between the Ethics of Responsibility of the German philosopher Hans Jonas and the notion of support in the ontology of the social according to the American thinker Judith Butler. Opposing individualistic positions, being the discussion of these two authors will provide us with a perspective where the human – always in dispute – is defined by its constitutive vulnerability, by being sustained and by its interdependence, concepts which are strongly connected to the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights. The struggle against the real threat that weighs upon the environment must be incorporated into the other conditions for the possibility to make all lives livable.
References
Biset, E. Y otros (2015). Sujeto, una categoría en disputa. Adrogué: La Cebra.
Brailovsky, A. E. (2004). Esta, nuestra única tierra. Ituizangó: Maipue.
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Abington: Routledge.
Butler, J. (2006). Deshacer el género. Barcelona: Paidós.
Butler, J. (2010). Marcos de guerra. Las vidas lloradas. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Butler, J. (2017). Cuerpos aliados y lucha política. Hacia una teoría performativa de la asamblea. Barcelona: Paidós.
Butler, J. (2020). La fuerza de la no violencia. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Conferencia General de la UNESCO. (2006). Declaración Universal sobre Bioética y Derechos Humanos (SHS/EST/BIO/06/1). Paris. Disponible en https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000146180_spa. (06/07/2022)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - IPCC (2021). Technical Summary. Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (Ar6). (IPCC AR6 WG III). Ginebra. Disponible en https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6wg3/pdf/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FinalDraft_TechnicalSummary.pdf. (04/07/2022)
Jonas, H. (1998). Pensar sobre Dios y otros ensayos. Barcelona: Herder.
Jonas, H. (1997). Técnica, medicina y ética. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Jonas, H. (1995). El principio de Responsabilidad. Ensayo de una Ética para la civilización tecnológica. Barcelona: Herder.
Jonas, H. (2017) El principio vida. Hacia una biología filosófica. Madrid: Trotta.
King Hubbert, M. (1956) Nuclear energy and the fossil fuels. Houston. American Petroleum Institute. https://web.archive.org/web/20080527233843/ http://www.hubbertpeak.com/hubbert/1956/1956.pdf (26/09/2022).
Martín-Sosa Rodriguez, S. (2016). Tecno-optimismo climático: el escapismo tecnológico frente al calentamiento global. Papeles de relaciones ecosociales y cambio global, 134, 25-38. Disponible en https://samuelmartinsosa.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/tecno-optimismo_ climatico_s-martin-sosa.pdf. (06/07/2022)
Wolovelsky, E. (2012). Un conflicto permanente. Sobre el darwinismo, la educación, el fundamento de la ley y la libertad de culto. Revista del Museo de La Plata, 12 (69), 76 - 82. Disponible en http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/ handle/10915/66405. (07/07/2022)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Xavier Viñals Torres

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.